Kinga Nogrady
Job: Information Management Service Officer
Department: Global Affairs Canada
Organization: IM Services
Phone: 343-203-5874
Email:
2015 Compensation:
Address: 200 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada, K1A 0G4
Based on 44 reviews
Fill up the form
0
0
100
45
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
Kinga Nogrady left the government in 2017, where she worked primarily in policy, not in direct service. During her time with the department, she was considered an expert—regularly asked to train specialists and new employees, and she even authored several procedural manuals.
She was consistently professional, passionate, and a strong advocate for her colleagues, both as an IMSO and as a union leader.
Some post-departure negative comments (all submitted within the same seven minutes) do not reflect my experience of working with her, nor do they align with the formal feedback she received at the time, including annual reviews and 360 assessments. In my view, Kinga did excellent work, and I wish her all the best
44 Reviews
LJ2025/09/30 9:46:14 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:46:11 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:59 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:56 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:56 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:55 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:55 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:53 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:52 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:08 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:07 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:07 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:06 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:06 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:05 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:04 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:03 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:03 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:03 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
LJ2025/09/30 9:45:03 pm
- Communication100%
- Quality of Advice100%
- Clarity of fees and costs100%
- Likeability100%
Loading.....Load More Reviews